|
Golf - Reading FormMost golf tippers decide their weekly choices for European and US tournaments by using the same procedure. First, they go by the form guide of the player. Next, past form on the links. Next comes more personal items, like injuries or messy divorces. And then there are statistics. Golf is one of those sports where stats are an essential betting guide. The PGA Tour lists 47 various categories of number crunches. Most are as useless as a European at a US Open, but some are invaluable in the pursuit of winners. The fundamental point is to know which stats to study. In golf, not all stats are the same. When you are preparing to place your bet, you need to know just what to look for when you read golf form. The main statistic is a player's Scoring Average. Not to be mistaken with a player's Stroke Average (called Actual Scoring Average in the US), it's listed on the PGA's website (pgatour.com). The governing body of the US tour defines Scoring Average as: 'A weighted average, which takes the stroke average of the field into account. 'It's calculated by adding a player's total strokes to an adjustment, and dividing by the total rounds played. The adjustment is calculated by determining the stroke average of the field for each round played, deducted from par to make an adjustment (per) round. A player accrues these adjustments for each round he plays in.' Flip side of the anomaly The best case in point of the flip side of this anomaly is Sergio Garcia, who up to the end of August ranked 28th on the Stroke Average but ninth on the Scoring Average. 'El Nino' takes part in few lower and middle ranking tournaments. Ergo, his ninth place on the Scoring Average gives a better indication of his performance level. But how do you use this for you own benefit? Odds compilers pairing golfers together for match bets sometimes take a snap judgment on the merits of certain players using the wrong figures. This is the place you can find some value. It advantageous to check carefully how players have been assessed to see which Averages the compilers are using. Putting stats are sometimes misconstrued, leading to poor player selection by bettors in tournaments requiring prowess with the flat stick. The US Open is commonly thought to require players to putt well to win. A friend advised me this season that neither Ernie Els nor Garcia would get into contention at Shinnecock Hills - despite the fact that both had come into the US Open after victories. The two of them ranked outside the top 60 in the Putts per Round section at the previous week's Buick Classic (which Garcia had won). Nonetheless, they were both inside the top 20 of the Putting Average (or Putts per Greens in Regulation) stats. My friend's doubts were misplaced, as both players made the top 10 in the US Open. Therefore, Putting Average - which counts only putts taken on greens that are hit in regulation - better gauges a player's putting ability. Why? Consider a player continually missing the green with his approach. He will be constantly chipping from off the green towards the cup. It makes sense that he will take fewer strokes with his putter because he will be closer to the hole when first using it. The Putting Average stat eradicates the effect of chipping close and one-putting a green. Solid gold irons Total Driving better mirrors how straight a player drives from the tee, as the further you hit the ball, the more it deviates from a true line. While this infers the shorter hitter should land the ball in play more often, it doesn't necessarily mean he is straighter. For instance, at the time of writing, Stephen Ames and Tom Pernice are ranked two spots apart on the Driving Accuracy stats. Nevertheless, allowing for how far each player hits the ball, Ames is significantly straighter off the tee, as Pernice yields nearly 25 yards on average per tournament, reflected in the naturalised Canadian's ninth place at Shinnecock Hills to Pernice's missed cut. The Total Driving stat also explains the controversy that the Greens in Regulation category is the best way to form an opinion on how good a player is with his irons. Briny Baird ranked 99th for Total Driving up to the 31st August, but fourth for GIR. Durant's second place in both categories may mean that he's a better iron player, but Baird has passed more than 90 professionals who, as stated in the stats, are better drivers than him. Joe Durant, meanwhile, doesn't improve. So it's okay to say Baird is a better iron player than Durant, even though the GIR stats don't suggest it. You should also reject Sand Save Percentage, which measures ability to finish a hole on par after being in a bunker. There isn't sufficient data around to make this stat worthwhile. To boost my case, just take a look at Els' ranking on the PGA Tour. Any instructor will inform you that the South African is considered the best in the business from sand. His ranking to the 31st August was 147th - laughably suggested otherwise. Finally, be wary of carrying a set of stats from one tournament to another, notably if two courses falling consecutively on a player's schedule are radically different. If you want to familiarise yourself with the strength of a tournament, look at how many world ranking points are on offer for that event. The higher the number of points, the stronger the field and the more worthwhile the form.
WEBSITES pgatour.com/stats europeantour.com/stats/data.sps golfstats.com owgr.com
Elliott's Golf Form Pro-Golf PGA Tour Media Guide
| |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Football |
Horse Racing | Golf
| Boxing | Financial Markets | Bookmakers |
Betting Exchanges | Spread Betting
| Contact Us | Home
|
Back to the Top |